Post #32211
-
-
Signature verified
The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.
-
-
{"entry_date":1633958630,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"bb2e2872c8aedf96ec696ac43504410091a18984a593e0f3b046d1fbb6d68c5eec60bee0c4d1613274ec3bfa836708e90501c0ea968acc61a1868b458a26b909","node_id":52,"post_date":1633958630,"thread_id":5784,"user_id":35},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/share-fct-inflation-with-token-holders-via-wfct-staking.5784\/post-32211"}The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
-
-
Share FCT inflation with token holders via WFCT staking
-
-
[QUOTE="PaulSnow, post: 32210, member: 29"]
How would WFCT be handled by a possible shift to Accumulate?
[/QUOTE]
Each WFCT is backed by real FCT.
[URL unfurl="true"]https://wfct.network/audit[/URL]
If FCT shifts into Accumulate's ACME, each WFCT will be backed by the corresponding amount of ACME.
We will need some kind of bridge or exchange to burn-WFCT-release-ACME.
E.g. if qTrade supports FCT hard fork, they will list ACME instead of FCT, convert FCT balances into ACME and enable WFCT/ACME exchange pair like [URL]https://qtrade.io/market/WFCT_FCT[/URL]
So technically it's feasible to support the FCT → ACME transition if it happens.This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.