Post #32328

8985238e7ba27a3114e1a3c02599988075ed5b314a163e346c90e53ff295e27c
56ccabd82962542a230d2e7161c12becbb4bb5b3e1b6aac7e2ced2214f5dbd22
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1637135079,"post_data":{"edit_count":1,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"1365a57f2caa101483d33637c8317b787a6c89e5c258cabd88e6449437859b7e97a82f9375ac1ede9f9b162a34c266284e5ddec9e3bfb3469fd40c6d4acb85cc","node_id":52,"post_date":1637135057,"thread_id":5795,"user_id":175},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/factom-to-upgrade-and-change-into-accumulate-network.5795\/post-32328"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Factom to upgrade and change into Accumulate Network
[QUOTE="Niels Klomp, post: 32324, member: 8"]
I certainly hope with a move to DPOS and having fresh blood on board we can leave these type of energy draining discussions and accusations behind us to a large extent, because that seriously hampers progress.
[/QUOTE]

We've had zero 'energy-draining' or any discussion for most of nine months, in which we've also seen zero progress until Inveniam stepped in. So the truth lies somewhere in the middle, I think.

I feel very responsible for how empty this year has been and I've taken lessons from it for the future. You get to those lessons by evaluating, and that means taking it on the chin if some parties have pent-up frustration to air, as long as they're not plain lies.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top