Post #32329

8985238e7ba27a3114e1a3c02599988075ed5b314a163e346c90e53ff295e27c
3d33cd43382a93a27e8709ae902c2cb998fe5ad7486f4862f03c42919c474b06
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1637136335,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"238736b96ddb02e7ef4dce4d08ac46f5383a633a0ffddb3ca383e32b3c62e8c5b03d42c7bf477f6d9f9aa843883e5c186af05a24b8d2115ac8050c9bbc32c280","node_id":52,"post_date":1637136335,"thread_id":5795,"user_id":8},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/factom-to-upgrade-and-change-into-accumulate-network.5795\/post-32329"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Factom to upgrade and change into Accumulate Network
I was talking in general, as this hasn't been the first time and is a result of how we organized things over time. Nobody is denying these. It is always important to take lessons.

At the same time this is also a crossroad to take these lessons, get renewed energy, have new blood on board and change general sentiment. That requires everyone to reflect and decide whether and how they want to play a role moving forward.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top