Post #32331

8985238e7ba27a3114e1a3c02599988075ed5b314a163e346c90e53ff295e27c
871e46408e598dd4c86822c4b668bbac221d46d048357b0602bf3dbe7f462e65
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1637217176,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"0485b76e3f538ed4e91636783f1f07eee3e64c444bca538b32e4f65b80de9f9240cd2513a6eb6aab0dab50d1d2f9158299a62cefc8816ba6e027c80a51d26acd","node_id":52,"post_date":1637217176,"thread_id":5795,"user_id":29},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/factom-to-upgrade-and-change-into-accumulate-network.5795\/post-32331"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Factom to upgrade and change into Accumulate Network
[QUOTE="Saul Schwartzbach, post: 32326, member: 28"]
I'm not trying to bash anything or point fingers at any single individual or party, so I sincerely hope nobody takes personal offense to my comments.
[/QUOTE]

I don't know how to unpack the comments, but I'm not offended either.

Accumulate gives us a chance to move forward. I hope we can address the causes of some of these issues.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top