Post #32363

df92cd700c1ba202eae61cdf514cb2d2f957661227f22689c825e4f2fb2a4ebb
9e2f593d86428f23d408315e763e2229b56c49fc2edda06929129f930b5b6398
e2c61429397da55a5ee7749088023feb12e0e8e261dfeba32ee7c0794f9a12f8
Signature verified

The signature from the blockchain entry has been verified against an identity on this server.

{"entry_date":1644330249,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"ef9f584f80be2295343d4fcdefe137095c81ad2ff64ce525ad4f7f2bec74858b5ab87e9f89515c83fca5b91eb2dd68b14add16a3076f7e6034557b6c7cc5099d","node_id":26,"post_date":1644330249,"thread_id":5796,"user_id":8},"post_link":"https:\/\/forum.factomprotocol.org\/threads\/de-facto-1-wfct%E2%80%93acme-burn-portal.5796\/post-32363"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
[De Facto-1] WFCT–ACME Burn Portal
WFCT is custodial at this point right?

Could you give insight into the amount of WFCT addresses holding tokens, because uniswap only lists 16 addresses, at which point 30K USD becomes a bit much. What is your opinion/vision on that and do you see any alternatives if it really is 16?
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top