Post #3240

899731754e27fc7ba1c4b7e5a037d45c74b4a2b14ad56ae8eb4daa29a34faa4b
fe550700824eae0f39e8b7533e6bf208a8f9317bbdf5b94c2d1e3d58c7edf224
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1533166651,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"28832335d1bbc4b15a8f23aca60983fb0dc12ed42298c5049927777fa4d9b8dd09941ef25f9b2e40314d3052a34a6403dad968e9878141036c58eb53bf162fe8","node_id":32,"post_date":1533166596,"thread_id":568,"user_id":30},"post_link":"http:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/568#post-3240"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Veteran Blockchain Investment Firm
Thank you for application and for your service.

What do you see as the major, specific pain-points that Factom could solve for the government entities you mention?

If you were going to pitch use of the protocol to one or more government officials, who would they be (ideally), and what is the gist of what you would say?
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top