Post #3785

899731754e27fc7ba1c4b7e5a037d45c74b4a2b14ad56ae8eb4daa29a34faa4b
bf48c71d732debfcb41e9d0487d0d76cdfc4910685de43ac9e9c97e8f9b04d44
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1534685731,"post_data":{"edit_count":1,"last_edit_date":1534685711,"last_edit_user_id":48,"message_sha512":"77bb5bdb376690cc349b1c239a5ada9523b3fc6009133d6381bd1dee1c669e01c98c6087a3c3c66ff5a8b04e6fcab512617fcc1e46efb7c075f56912df6ac30d","node_id":32,"post_date":1534681855,"thread_id":568,"user_id":48},"post_link":"http:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/568#post-3785"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Veteran Blockchain Investment Firm
[USER=27]@briandeery[/USER],

[I]BD01) Do you realize that factom as it stands today cannot pay out to more than one address per server? This complicates the plan to have multiple payouts per server for the charity you are planning.[/I]

Yes, we are aware. IF we are successful in being able to establish the endowment, we will likely alter one node for grant pool/WVU payout while the other node is for grant/Veteran payout. This is obviously not long term, considering we will be forfeiting a node at some point in time. Where this may become an issue is in the future when Veteran must relinquish a node. We will evaluate the tax implications of this and decide upon the best course of action to meet all of our obligations. Maybe a grant proposal to allow multiple address payouts is in the not too distant future… :)
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top