Post #684

210049d3729ee5e226f2fa8c2b27030b5c215588ff447655b2671bdb717671a8
f40b766e29ab0ce9d933fd6e5ec4242a06cd332f773b319c8fd2c8be4ce846f6
Signature not verified

This entry might be using an old signature, or it was signed by a key that does not exist on the server.

{"entry_date":1532465605,"post_data":{"edit_count":0,"last_edit_date":0,"last_edit_user_id":0,"message_sha512":"8632b1e8700e637b52cde5e7e30e7283d2fde97221dcafea4046a0e33a0a756370290cb7f5d64a7580af8a2e666508cb746c37e630a71a9ee3775b5c272d749f","node_id":10,"post_date":1524693157,"thread_id":86,"user_id":34},"post_link":"http:\/\/factomize.com\/forums\/index.php?threads\/86#post-684"}
The entry content as it exists in the database. This should be verified against the blockchain entry.
Block Party
[QUOTE="Niels, post: 522, member: 8"][B]NK03)[/B]

Could you tailor that claim to Factom and provide both possible positives and negatives if applicable?[/QUOTE]

Please see our response to Matt O's question above, which adds further detail and covers the positive aspects. Any negatives we’re aware of would seem to be the potential pitfalls of blockchain technology more generally, outside the scope of this proposal.
This is the raw content, without BBCode parsing.
Top