Recent content by Nic R

  1. Nic R

    Hey Mark, Are you still interested in being in the Exchange Working Group? Just confirming.

    Hey Mark, Are you still interested in being in the Exchange Working Group? Just confirming.
  2. Nic R

    Hey Brian, Are you still interested in being in the Exchange Working Group? Just confirming...

    Hey Brian, Are you still interested in being in the Exchange Working Group? Just confirming; thanks, man!
  3. Nic R

    Hey Anton, Are you still interested in joining the Exchange Working Group? Just confirming.

    Hey Anton, Are you still interested in joining the Exchange Working Group? Just confirming.
  4. Nic R

    Removal: DBGrow (Guide) Represented by Nic Robinette

    To the Factom Protocol Community, I understand the reasoning and motivation to remove me from the Guide role, and I’ll try to respond as fully and truly as I can. In the near 11 months that I have been a Guide, I cannot say that I have lived up to my own standards or to what I believe are...
  5. Nic R

    Removal: DBGrow (Guide) Represented by Nic Robinette

    Hey David, I understand and am acknowledging this process. I am writing out a thoughtful response, and will be posting it here shortly. Thank you.
  6. Nic R

    Vote Nic R Removed Standing for HashQuark

    Here is the link to the thread that shows HashQuark's intentions to perform better in the future: https://factomize.com/forums/threads/factom-community-contribution-proposal-2020-hashquark.3352/#post-24328 I want to see their improvement first before giving my Support.
  7. Nic R

    Process Discussion New Marketing Committee formation

    Bumping this thread. So far, I have only heard back from Perly, and have not heard back about confirmations to participate in this working group from anyone else. Could everyone interested or not interested please voice their preference? Thank you.
  8. Nic R

    Process Discussion New Exchange committee formation

    Bumping this thread. In order to move forward with the Exchange Working Group formation, I need to know who is interested in participating. Thank you!
  9. Nic R

    Process Discussion New Marketing Committee formation

    Hey everyone, based on the responses above, my understanding is that the Marketing "Committee" will move forward as a working group. If that is the case, can those interested in participating in this working group please indicate their interest below? @Julian Fletcher-Taylor @Keith Pincombe...
  10. Nic R

    Process Discussion New Exchange committee formation

    Alright, everyone. I am confirming then that the Exchange "Committee" will move forward as a working group rather than a committee. If that is the case, who would like to participate in this working group going forward? @WB @Anton Ilzheev @Julian Fletcher-Taylor @Matt Osborne My present...
  11. Nic R

    Should "LayerTech Core Development Grant Update (Grant Round 1, 2019)" go up for final determination?

    I think that Grants that existed prior to the ratification of Doc 106 should still be put up for Grant Success determination. If we still have open Grants from Round 1, and it's unclear as to whether they were completed or successful, we should have some process of inquiry to understand the...
  12. Nic R

    Process Discussion Decision making, effectiveness and changes needed for 2020

    Hey Niels, thank you for bringing this discussion forward and for your transparency and honesty. I will tackle one of the first elephants in the room (so to speak) and can admit that my leadership/guidance and mind-share in the Guide space has been severely lacking. While I do feel I've made...
  13. Nic R

    Grant round 2019-04 - Calculating FCT available in pool

    This looks fine to me. As mentioned before, the only real issue I could foresee is the 3% potential Efficiency change factor, but as discussed earlier, we can always activate or pay out at a later block in a worst case scenario. @Tor -- Your math is sound, and @Brian, I agree with the grand...
  14. Nic R

    Ratified Doc109 - Committees and working groups

    I think this is important language; we want to ensure that committees understand their responsibility when speaking with third parties and we also want them to understand the proper channels that they can use to communicate. I think this potential addition makes things more clear and easily...
  15. Nic R

    Guide Meeting # 19-42 1.0

    Guide meeting minutes from meeting on 2019-10-14.
Top