Search results

  1. Nic R

    Process Discussion Doc 109 - Committee Framework

    Hello Factom Protocol Community, The below link leads to Doc 109 - Committee Framework. This document attempt to resolve ambiguities in committee formation, purpose, and structure, as well as clarifies the nature of a committee Chairman's election and removal, if need be. Please read, review...
  2. Nic R

    ANO Round (#3) - Instructions for Standing Parties on Scoring Process

    ANO Selection Process Thank you for your participation in the ANO selection process so far by reviewing the submitted information and asking questions. This post is to advise of the next steps in this ANO selection round (Round #3) Differences for this ANO selection round First, we will...
  3. Nic R

    Doc 001 - Factom Governance Document (suggested changes for V.1.5)

    Hello Everyone, This timed discussion is created to facilitate the amendment of the Factom Governance Document (Doc 001) to apply suggested changes. All the suggested changes are detailed in this spreadsheet. The suggested changes are viewable in the Governance document available here. After...
  4. Nic R

    Ratified Single-Use -- ANO Round 3 -- Ratification Document

    The ANO Round research group has prepared a series of changes to the ANO application and scoring process that are represented in the following ratification document and its supplemental Google documents and sheets herein. We would now like to seek community feedback and approval of this...
  5. Nic R

    DBGrow Inc.

    Legal Entity Name: DBGrow Inc. As Represented By: Nic Robinette AKA: SanFranSeahawk Candidacy Statement - Guide Role DBGrow Inc., as represented by Nic Robinette, is running to become a Guide in the Factom Protocol. Education and Affiliations I graduated from University of California...
  6. Nic R

    Process Discussion Should we create a Research Group to build out an approach for inter-ANO review?

    During the monthly ANO meeting held on Thursday, January 31st, 2019 at 1900 UTC, the concept of creating a research group to establish "confidence" or "no confidence" in inter-ANO review was discussed. This concept arises from the motivation to ensure that ANO's are providing value to the...
  7. Nic R

    Process Discussion Should we implement a "trial period" for new ANO's?

    Should we implement a "trial period" when ANO's would not officially be onboarded until 3 months have elapsed after ANO Election Round 3 concludes? This is a "Minor Timed Discussion", meaning that this discussion period will last for 3 days, and then a vote will occur here on Factomize. If we...
  8. Nic R

    Process Discussion Should we have a maximum amount of ANO's allowed into the Authority Set for ANO Election Round 3, and if so, how many?

    Should we have a maximum amount of ANO's allowed into the Authority Set for ANO Election Round 3, and if so, how many? This is a "Minor Timed Discussion", meaning that this discussion period will last for 3 days, and then a vote will occur here on Factomize. If we need to extend the time for...
  9. Nic R

    Process Discussion Should Guides be allowed to vote with greater weight than any current ANO in ANO Election Round 3?

    Should Guides be allowed to vote with greater weight than any current ANO in ANO Election Round 3? This is a "Minor Timed Discussion", meaning that this discussion period will last for 3 days, and then a vote will occur here on Factomize. If we need to extend the time for discussion, we can do...
Top