I'm perfectly fine with questions being asked of us. They should be, in fact. And if, after all those questions, the reason for removal of Standing was "After proper evaluation of your proposal, we feel your efficiency is too low for the amount of work you'll be doing" then I'd be ok with it. An arbitrary number held across all ANOs as a single point of failure is lazy and stupid.Interested to hear there response as to me @Factomize is roughly the only entity in this system I would trust with running at 0% without much questions asked as they have always shown to have the interest of the protocol in mind.
The ANO remuneration and grantpool is about furthering the protocol. I as well as BIF/Sphereon prefer the grantpool above remuneration, but applying a general arbitrary limit against every single situation isn't correct IMO. Net result is that Factomize won't move forward at this point in time.