Whilst in the previous report you mentioned:It is now clear that the funds we sent to QuadrigaCX will never be recovered. With this in mind, in addition to the fact that our partner does not intend to invest much in Operenzy for the foreseeable future, we decided not to invest more in this project in order to focus our funds and energy on our partnership with NSim Technology.
That sentence indicates the project was well underway or am I missing something here?Please keep in mind that this is still in beta and that we will produce a comprehensive paper about what we intended to add and develop, once we are able to proceed with this specific investment.
For sure, the platform is actually in beta mode using a classic approach (centralized DB with MySQL). If someone is interested to help integrating the actual architecture with the Factom API, something can probably be done.Thx for the clarification, but my question was more about mentioning the betastate of the integration in your previous update, which as a software developer I know is obviously not a production situation, but typically not for off. So my question is more was that categorization of or is there anything possible to help realize it?
The Owner is interested by the project AND also interested integrating it in Factom but the company have some liquidity problems.Ah ok so the beta mention in your previous update was about the Operenzy project itself not about your work to integrate Factom. Thx.
Is the owner not interested in the project itself or in adding Factom specifically?